Andy Burnham is quickly emerging as the obvious replacement for Keir Starmer. In a head-to-head leadership contest between the three likely forerunners, 29% of the public would want Burnham to win, compared with 16% for Starmer and just 8% for Wes Streeting. But beneath that headline is hesitation, with just under a quarter (23%) saying 'none of the above', with the same share unsure. When asked more broadly who should replace Starmer if he resigns, 20% chose Burnham, with a comparable amount (22%) saying 'none of the above' and 33% unsure.

As Tony Blair noted in a reflective, albeit awkwardly timed, essay this week, the instinct to reach for a Burnham reset as a silver bullet for Labour's governing problems misses the core of what has gone wrong. The problem is not only in the leadership, but in the condition of the party itself. Labour's 2024 victory owed much to Conservative unpopularity, rather than a clear long-term vision of its own. That absence cannot be resolved simply by changing leader.

Gorton and Denton was always going to test Labour. A working-class constituency, represented consistently by Labour since 1935, became a live experiment: is Labour still the natural home of working-class voters, in an era of a Reform insurgency on the Right, and growing Green momentum on the Left?

By the end of the night, the answer looked uncomfortable. Labour finished third on 25.4%, behind the Green Party (40.6%) and Reform (28.7%). The key question now is whether this was a local mishap, or a warning signal of a deeper structural shift on the Left.

Foreign policy can define a premiership. Just ask Tony Blair, whose decision to join the Iraq War became the defining controversy of his time in office, overshadowing much of what he achieved domestically.

Two decades later, the legacy of Iraq still looms over British foreign policy. It shapes how the public views military intervention, how politicians justify the use of force, and how closely Britain should align itself with the United States when faced with conflict.

Generative AI tools are getting more powerful by the week, and they're now a routine part of how content is created online. What started as a novelty – funny pictures of politicians, selfies transformed into faux oil paintings – has evolved into darker territory. One of the most sensitive developments is the ability to generate sexual images of real people, so-called 'undressing', without their consent. The practice raises questions that straddle long-standing concerns over image-based abuse, as well as debates surrounding AI governance and the age-old question of freedom of expression.

Research from the Center for Countering Digital Hate found that Grok, the chatbot from Elon Musk's xAI, generated an estimated three million sexualised images in just 100 days, including 23,000 images of children. Cases like these have pushed the issue of AI-based sexual abuse firmly onto policymakers' desks.